Posted on August 25, 2010, 11:01 am, by Gordon Pearson, under
Agency theory,
Corporate Ownership,
Economic History,
Economic Theory,
Free Market Capitalism,
Management Practice,
Shareholder Value.
Since Adam Smith’s example of the pin factory, economists have never been able to produce a satisfactory theory of the industrial firm. They’ve thought of it as a black box, expressed it as a production function involving such illuminating variables as price and quantity, and they’ve reduced it to the agency relationship falsely claiming managers [...]
Posted on August 2, 2010, 11:34 pm, by Gordon Pearson, under
Corporate Governance,
Corporate Ownership,
Economic Theory,
Financial Sector,
Free Market Capitalism,
Management Practice,
Moral Hazard.
Almost every empirical study of the value of takeovers indicates that overall there is no gain; the acquirer doesn’t benefit and the overall economy usually loses out. The only ones who gain are the shareholders of the acquired company, and in cases like the Tomkins sell out currently going through, its top management whose pay [...]
Posted on June 22, 2010, 9:35 am, by Gordon Pearson, under
Corporate Governance,
Corporate Ownership,
Economic History,
Economic Theory,
Free Market Capitalism,
Management History,
Management Practice,
Management Theory,
Political Decision,
Public Sector,
Shareholder Value.
Keynes recognised that the legislation protecting worker’s rights might lead to powerful trades unions, motivated by political ideals rather than the long term interests of their members, being the cause of wages led inflation damaging economic activity. His mistake was to argue that it was a political problem for governments, rather than a problem for [...]
Keynes said he could see no reason why a government should become involved in owning a railway. However, the result of privatizing British Rail and trying to open it to competition, suggests Keynes may have been short-sighted. Monopoly might be a bad thing when exploited by some profit maximising economist, but the case against [...]
Milton Friedman is given a rather severe critique in The Rise and Fall of Management, especially over his malign influence on industrial management, how it is taught and how it is done. The Friedmanism which best captures his contribution to that endeavour is the one which tells the world that ‘corporate officials’ have no ‘social [...]